Note (07APR2025):Whatever happened to the news about the assassination of JFK? Gone amid a flurry of other items, many of which are less relevant to the lives of most Americans and the well-being of the nation.

-End-

Some person assassinated President John F. Kennedy (JFK) in Dallas on 22NOV1963 — undisputed fact. President Trump just released 80,000 pages of documents pertaining thereto. To what do they amount? A cloud of governmental obfuscation of the truth.

Actually, there is a truth to be found in the assassination of President Kennedy. It’s a truth both simple and straightforward.

What is that truth? Lee Harvey Oswald did not assassinate Kennedy.

There are simple facts absolving Oswald; facts largely ignored by Mainstream Media. What are those facts? The following:

1) Prior to the day of assassination, Adlai Stevenson had warned Kennedy not to go to Dallas. Why? Supposedly, Stevenson physically had been attacked there and viewed it as a dangerous place, which clearly it was. Interesting but hardly conclusive although it sets the stage for that which was to come. Was there another reason for the warning? We probably never shall know.

2) On the day of the assassination, one of the attending physicians at Parkland Memorial Hospital reported to the Media that Kennedy had died from a gunshot and that part of this brain (the cerebellar tonsils) was hanging out the back of his neck; therefore, the entry of the bullet must have been from the front not the back. Other physicians in the Emergency Room at the time corroborated the report on film.

Oswald was in a building to the rear of Kennedy’s car; hence, the lethal shot could not have been fired by Oswald but most likely was fired by someone else from the grassy knoll in front of Kennedy’s car. Conclusive? Yes!

Note: As a medical student, this commentator was walking with a professor of Pathology while she was commenting on the physician’s initial report of Kennedy’s brain hanging out the back of his neck. To this commentator, conclusive? Yes!

3) Initial reports claimed that a single slug had killed Kennedy then wounded Governor Connally. Subsequently, a single shot became two shots then three. Reportedly, Connally himself denied that only a single shot was fired. From the beginning, governmental obfuscation clouded the truth.

Why did Jacqueline Kennedy climb to the rear of the car immediately after Kennedy was shot? There is photographic evidence that she did although she conveniently claimed not to remember doing so. Affrighted for her life if she admitted that she did remember?

4) After his arrest, Oswald shouted, “I’m a patsy!” Had he been the assassin, would he have been shouting his innocence to the world? Doubtful.

A marksman in the Marines, would Oswald have used an Italian rifle designed in the late 19th-century as his weapon of choice? Again, doubtful.

5) Two days after the assassination, Jack Ruby, a known mobster supposedly felt so upset that he assassinated Oswald, whom the police had allowed to become a target at Police Headquarters by parading him openly for any would-be assailant.

It was reported that, prior to Kennedy’s assassination, Ruby was seen talking with Oswald the preceding October at Ruby’s nightclub. Afterwards, Ruby conveniently died awaiting a re-trial for the murder of Oswald. Suspicious? Definitely. Believe the governmental report from Ruby’s autopsy? Valid toxicology, anyone?

Recommendations: Ignore any reports after the actual day of the assassination. Ignore the report from the autopsy. Ignore the report of the Warren Commission as though anyone with any shred of judgement would believe any utterance from Earl Warren himself. Ignore the 80,000 pages of obfuscation being produced, thus far. Ignore them . . . unless, that is, you believe in faery-tales.

So, who did kill Kennedy? Ask yourself, Who had the most to gain?

Lyndon Baines Johnson; a nasty, awful man capable of any and all foul deeds? It was well known that JFK was not going to choose LBJ as his running mate in 1964. Motive enough! Jackie hated the man, rightfully so. Wait! LBJ could not have shot JFK himself. So, who did? Some element in the CIA, among which was reportedly an extreme anti-JFK element? A conspiracy between LBJ and that anti-JFK element in the CIA? We probably never shall know.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x