Does President Trump symbolize the last stand against anti-American disestablishmentarianism? Higher intellect works off patterns. Patterns can become symbols; e.g., national flags. What does Mr. Trump as President symbolize?

As noted in the call-to-action novel, Retribution Fever, we are witnessing a fragmenting, declining nation on fire. Deepening debt. Serial, military defeats. Deplorable depravity. Biological deceit. Historical deceit. These United States of America have devolved into a nation committing suicide by a thousand cuts. Symbolically, what would be the consequence of impeachment then conviction of Mr. Trump?

“Bah, humbug!” you might say. “Whatever the case, merely a temporary phase. What did Bismark say? ‘God watches out for little children, fools, drunks and the United States of America.’ God did. God is. God will.”

Really? Still?

“An autopsy of history would show that all great nations commit suicide.” -Arnold Toynbee (1889-1975)

Is God watching out for these United States? How? As He watched out for the British Empire?

The UK in 1900. The preëminent power. The English pound, the reserve currency. Then, the British began to commit national suicide in 1914 by entering an ill-considered and devastating war against Germany. The victor? The USA!

That was then. Now, is ruin Americans’ turn? Does Mr. Trump symbolize the last stand of American traditionalists against collectivism under a socialistic tyranny? To understand the truths in the present, we must look to the truths of the past.


“If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.” -George Orwell (1903-1950)

Truth? How about one truth that revisionists of The Left really don’t want to hear? Consider the following:

The men who founded this nation in 1776 were Christian Euro-Caucasians, mainly English. Anglo-Protestantism continued as the contextual standard of reference. The “Know-Nothings” of the early 19th-century, including a Jewish congressman therein, tried to keep it that way, but finally they failed during the 1850s.

With that failure came an influx of Irish Catholics. Then, during the late 19th and early 20th-centuries came the eastern and southern Europeans, many of them Catholic and Jewish. Despite that massive influx, the Anglo-Protestant model remained the standard of reference. By the early mid-1930s, however, that standard was coming under increasing attack, especially from those who controlled Big Media, many immigrants from eastern Europe or their descendants. Yet, until the end of World War II the model remained relatively intact. No longer.

During the 1960s, disestablishmentarianism accelerated against traditional American ideals and values embodying Anglo-Protestantism. A Democratically-controlled Congress and White House packaged two pieces of radical legislation together with a string of unconstitutional decisions by the Warren-led Court into a single time-bomb that was to destroy these United States; at least, as the nation conceived by the Founding Fathers.

“In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice, there is.” -Yogi Berra (1925-2015)

The first piece of legislation was the so-called Civil Rights Act of 1964. Consequence? A restructured American society such that historical rights became modern wrongs. Primarily, it destroyed the right not to associate even though the Supreme Court (Roberts v. United States Jaycees, 1984) later affirmed that right in theory. The Act also empowered those who could not succeed by merit to succeed by force of a law created by politicians. It became a cornerstone in deconstructing a patriarchal United States and constructing a matriarchal one. That which seems at first glance so right often turns out so wrong.

Then came the second piece of legislation, the Hart-Celler Act of 1965. The Act opened the floodgates to hordes of non-European immigrants. Demographics are destiny. Diversity breeds divisiveness. Consequence? Destructiveness. A little diversity may season a society; too much destroys it. Now, many among the increasingly dispossessed, numerically decreasing majority paradoxically are promoting their own demise and even celebrating it in a self-loathing, political orgy bathed in suicidal, abstract ideology divorced from reality.


“Remember, democracy never lasts long. It soon wastes, exhausts, and murders itself. There never was a democracy yet that did not commit suicide.” -President John Adams (1725-1826)

From Big Media, we incessantly hear the word, “democracy”. Here’s another truth! The Framers of the Constitution did not create a pure democracy nor even a republican democracy. To them, the word, democracy, was an obscenity. Rather, they created a patriarchal, democratic republic in which some citizens but not all were entitled to vote. Over recent decades, the nation, however, has been transforming itself into matriarchal republican democracy.

Witness the consequences. The main one? Dependence upon government. That which seems at first glance so right often turns out so wrong.

The transformation towards a matriarchal, republican democracy began in 1920 with ratification of Amendment XIX, whereby men entitled women to vote. Today, abolition of the Electoral College as promoted by The Left would complete the transformation with only a few, large megalopolises controlling the rest of the country. Matriarchy would solidify its rule. Problem! There never has been a successful matriarchal society of any importance in the history of mankind.

Is there an alternative to we Americans plodding down this Path to Perdition? Can we reroute the nation onto the Road to Resurrection — resurrection of individual liberty in a context of capitalism and traditional American ideals and values?

“Ask, and it shall be given you; seek, and ye shall find; knock, and it shall be opened unto you.” -Matthew 7:7

If so, what is that alternative? How do we achieve it? Who will lead us symbolically and operationally? Mr. Trump? If he fails or even falters, will he have represented the last stand against matriarchal collectivism, secular relativism, and socialistic tyranny — or is there, yet, another way to avert national suicide? If so, what and how? Retribution Fever answers that question with a detailed blueprint based on Science not superstition.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x