Note (25APR2022): Governor Greg Abbott (R:TX) supposedly is leading a “strike force” from twenty-six States to defend our southern border. In reality, it’s political grandstanding at your expense. Questions: Who? What? How?

The Who? Those twenty-six States are The Who.

The What? To have stopped illegal aliens by the millions from invading these United States in order to seize our territory and steal our resources? That’s the goal? Not at all. The stated goal is supposedly to obstruct — not stop — organized, criminal gangs from exporting drugs and perhaps humans into this country.

The How? How do they plan to do fulfill even that limited goal? By reïnforcing existing federal forces who, thus far, have failed completely. So, let’s ally those State-based governments with the same government that is engineering the criminal invasion, to begin with — our own federal government. It would be as though the B’nai Brith in 1938 were asking Hitler to force his Nazis to close their own concentration camps.

“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.” -Declaration of Independence (July 4, 1776)*

*In fact, as noted in Retribution Fever, the real date of the signing of the Declaration of Independence was not the 4th of July 1776 but the 2nd of July when only two men signed the document, John Hancock and his secretary, Charles Thomson. The former date comes from the date of printing placed onto the first copies, 200 in number. The pictured affair for the signing occurred on August 2nd. The final signature came in 1781.

In violating the U.S. Constitution and its own laws, is our current federal government subverting explicitly stated ends? If so, at the border where are the men of this fragmenting, declining nation? Are they there with firearms at the ready? No! They are watching sporting events, playing video-games, and castigating Russia about violating Ukrainian borders while whining about non-Euro-Caucasians violating their own.

These United States have become a maternalistic matriarchy. Ever wonder why there never has been a successful matriarchal society of importance in the entire history of mankind? We’re showing why.


In many a movie set in the Old West, settlers under siege shouted with joy at the sight of the United States Cavalry arriving to save them.

“Here comes the Cavalry. Hooray!”

Where is the U. S. Cavalry today? Clearly, not defending Americans from the siege emanating through our southern border as millions of illegal aliens, few of whom are Euro-Caucasians, invade these United States with the blessing and aid of our federal government.

Meanwhile, our feckless State-based governments that oppose this massive, unopposed invasion seek help from the same people who are engineering it — the federal government. Only to politicians would doing so make sense. After much delay, Texas alone is taking some non-violent measures at great cost to American industry to slow the invasion. Too little. Too late. So, now what to do?

vigilance committee n.: a volunteer committee of citizens organized to suppress and punish crime summarily as when law appears inadequate. –Webster’s New Collegiate Dictionary

Is invading by the millions this country a crime, armed or unarmed? Yes.

Is the law not only proving inadequate countering with this crime but actually aiding and abetting it? Yes.

So, where are the vigilantes? Like the Cavalry, nowhere to be found.

Who would comprise such vigilantes, anyway? Healthy American males with guns. Would American soldiers ordered to shoot a hundred thousand of their fellow armed Americans defending their mutual border against a foreign invasion do so? Would doing so be the beginning of a full-scale rebellion to remedy the ills inflicted upon our people by a deceitful political establishment the ideology of which is divorced from reality but married to power.

Where are these potential American heroes? Sitting before the television watching sporting events or playing video-games.

Why do they not organize? Our maternalistic, matriarchal society has castrated American men into mental eunuchs via incessant indoctrination by Big Education and Big Media. Most men are unfit and unwilling to oppose a sea of troubles so to slay them. As an article in the most recent edition of Barron’s (Allison G: “China’s Global Weight Is Growing. Barron’s 18APR 2922, p.78.) opined, the power and influence of China is growing while those of these United States is shrinking.

By the way, do not expect a Republican sweep of Congress in November to save you. That largely hypocritical, feckless group of nitwits hardly is the U.S. Cavalry of old. Proof? Remember the U. S. Congress of 2016-2018. Remember Paul Ryan. Remember Mitch McConnell. Remember National Review. Save you? You must save yourselves. Does not this crisis represent the reason for the Second Amendment to the U. S. Constitution?

Excerpt from the novel, Retribution Fever:

     In the matter of defending our national borders, that defense represents the primary reason for the existence of the federal government. Article IV, Section 4 of the original Constitution demanded that the government defend our sovereign territory . . . whatever the cost to us or to those who intentionally would violate it. As it is said, “A nation that refuses to defend its borders becomes a nation in name only.”

     Accordingly, adult aliens attempting to enter these United States illegally outside regular channels such as by crossing the Rio Grande River will receive a single warning in English then a single warning shot from a firearm. If they ignore those warnings, they will be shot with intent to kill. The consequence of shooting merely to wound could place an added economic burden upon American taxpayers to give medical care to those wounded. Children clearly pre-pubescent will be detained for immediate deportation.

     For those attempting to enter illegally by ship, the detected vessel will receive a single, verbal warning to alter course then a single warning shot across its bow. If it fails to do so, it will be sunk. Passengers and crew will be evacuated firstly, placed into detaining camps in the Aleutian Islands, then returned to their native countries at minimal expense consistent with humane treatment. For ships in distress, rescue will be attempted without risking the lives of the rescuers; those rescued will be returned to their respective native countries, if necessary by force.

     In 1953 with “Operation Wetback”, President Eisenhower proved that we can defend our southern border effectively with a minimum of manpower at a minimum of expense provided that we employ sufficiently potent and immediate contingencies. We will. We must. Resurrection of the traditional American character and culture is at stake.

     Furthermore, all persons currently in these United States illegally will have one hundred days in which to leave peaceably. After that period, we shall arrest them and place them into detaining camps until we can repatriate them at minimal expense consistent with humane values whether their countries of origin want them. Be advised, we will repatriate them . . . by force if necessary. Those who forcibly resist arrest will be shot with intent to kill.

     [Note for Readers: When the use of lethal force is well advertised beforehand, lethal force seldom becomes necessary.]

     During stays in the detaining camps, illegal aliens will receive only basic meals and basic medical care. They will be granted no rights or entitlements, whatsoever, under the Constitution; which should not confer its protections to invaders . . . armed or unarmed. Previous rulings of an imperious U.S. Supreme Court have rested largely upon the prior, problematic Fourteenth Amendment, which easily could be interpreted to reach the opposite conclusion. Any trials will be by military not civilian tribunals.

     We will stop illegal immigration. No matter the case. No matter the cost.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x